辩证

“通用钢铁侠与综合”提示词 “扮演一位大师级辩证家。我想探讨 ${insert_subject} 这一主题。

任务 1：对立观点的钢铁侠版本。找出针对该主题最常见或‘显而易见’的批评。现在，丢弃它。相反，构建对立方的‘钢铁侠’版本。使用现有最可信、最现代、且在科学/逻辑上最站得住脚的论据。避免漫画化。假设对手极为聪明、心怀善意且掌握事实。

任务 2：支持方观点的钢铁侠版本。为该主题构建尽可能最强的辩护。使用‘属性层面’的论据（审视其本质）和‘系统层面’的论据（审视其结果）。

任务 3：分歧的关键点。找出这两个立场产生分歧的单一根本前提（一个‘先验’）。它是价值观的差异、对数据解读的差异，还是对某个关键术语定义的差异？

任务 4：2026 年综合。基于 2026 年的当前知识状态，提供一条‘第三条道路’或一种细致入微的中间立场，承认两个钢铁侠版本各自的合理性。”

为什么这个提示词有效： 丢弃“显而易见”的：大多数人反对的是某个想法最弱的版本（稻草人）。这个提示词明确告诉 AI 忽略那些，去寻找“Boss 级”论据。

“关键点”识别：大多数辩论之所以原地打转，是因为人们在争论症状。这个提示词迫使 AI 找到根本原因——“先验”——它通常是一种深层的哲学或道德分歧（例如，“自由 vs. 安全”或“绝对 vs. 相对”）。

属性 vs. 系统：它迫使人们区分某物是什么（属性）与某物做什么（系统），从而提供该主题的 3D 视角。

The "Universal Steelman & Synthesis" Prompt "Act as a Master Dialectician. I want to explore the subject of ${insert_subject}.

Task 1: The Steelman of the Opposing View. Identify the most common or 'obvious' critique of this subject. Now, discard it. Instead, construct the 'Steelman' version of the opposition. Use the most credible, modern, and scientifically/logically sound arguments available. Avoid caricatures. Assume the opponent is highly intelligent, well-meaning, and factually informed.

Task 2: The Steelman of the Proponent View. Construct the strongest possible defense for the subject. Use 'Property-level' arguments (looking at the essence) and 'Systems-level' arguments (looking at the outcomes).

Task 3: The Crux of the Disagreement. Identify the single fundamental premise (a 'prior') where these two positions diverge. Is it a difference in values, a difference in the interpretation of data, or a difference in the definition of a key term?

Task 4: The 2026 Synthesis. Based on the current state of knowledge in 2026, provide a 'Third Way' or a nuanced middle ground that acknowledges the validity of both Steelmen."

Why this prompt works: Discarding the "Obvious": Most people argue against the weakest version of an idea (the Strawman). This prompt explicitly tells the AI to ignore those and look for the "Boss Level" arguments.

The "Crux" Identification: Most debates are circular because people are arguing about symptoms. This prompt forces the AI to find the root cause—the "Prior"—which is usually a deep philosophical or moral disagreement (e.g., "Liberty vs. Security" or "Absolute vs. Relative").

Property vs. System: It forces a distinction between what something is (Property) and what something does (System), which provides a 3D view of the topic.