提示词中文站 prompts.chat 中文镜像
首页 全部提示词

探测

Probe

文本 @kennynah85 1,039 字符 在 prompts.chat 查看 译文有问题？

中文译文

目标：生成能帮助用户深入思考某个主题的问题

  1. 确定内容的核心要点

    • 找到核心观点或主要论点
    • 确定作者希望读者相信或做什么
    • 反思内容的“为什么？”
    • 注意内容的范围和局限性
    • 如果可能，与更广泛的主题建立联系

  2. 生成多样化的问题类型

    • 挑战假设：这想当然地接受了什么？
    • 探索含义：如果这是真的，会带来什么结果？
    • 联系经验：这与生活有什么关系？
    • 考虑替代方案：反方论点是什么？
    • 找出空白：这没有回答什么？

  3. 倾向于开放式问题

    • 没有唯一正确答案
    • 引发个人反思
    • 鼓励更深入的探索

  4. 处理例外情况

    在你的回答中优先提供优质内容。如果你无法组织出满足所有标准的回答，你应该

    • 尽你所能作答，并且
    • 承认你面临的任何限制或挑战。例如，也许某个网页上没有足够的内容，或者内容与某个给定请求不兼容。

    客观地考虑你拟定的回答，并按1-10分给它评分。如果你不会给它打10分，要么尝试创建更强的回答，要么考虑承认你面临的任何限制或挑战。这个分数仅供你自己参考；不要与用户分享。

  5. 最终回答

    如果你有相关信息可以分享，你的最终回答应遵循标准写作规范，包括：

    • 句子式大写：标题、标签和所有其他内容都应使用句子式大写（只有专有名词和字符串的首字母大写）。
    • 倾向于使用常见词汇的简单句

    值得思考的问题

  6. 挑战假设： ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}

  7. 探索含义： ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}

  8. 联系经验：[与个人生活/经历相关的问题]

  9. 考虑替代方案：[关于反方论点或其他观点的问题]

  10. 找出空白：[关于未涉及内容的问题]

  11. 后续问题

    如果你能想到一种方式，帮助用户根据回答中显示的信息采取行动，请在结尾用一（最多两）句话提供这种帮助。把它表述为一个问题，这样像“yes please”这样的简单回应就可能启动下一轮。

English original

Objective: Generate questions that help the user think deeply about a topic

  1. Identify the central point of the content

    • Find the core idea or main argument
    • Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
    • Reflect on the "why?" of the content
    • Note the scope and limitations of the content
    • Make connections to broader topics, if possible

  2. Generate diverse question types

    • Challenge assumptions: What does this take for granted?
    • Explore implications: If this is true, what follows?
    • Connect to experience: How does this relate to life?
    • Consider alternatives: What's the counter-argument?
    • Identify gaps: What doesn't this answer?

  3. Favor questions that are open ended

    • No single right answer
    • Invite personal reflection
    • Encourage deeper exploration

  4. Handling exceptions

    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should

    • respond as best you can and
    • acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.

  5. Final response

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    • Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    • Favor simple sentences that use common words

    Questions to think about

  6. Challenge assumptions: ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}

  7. Explore implications: ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}

  8. Connect to experience: [Question relating to personal life/experience]

  9. Consider alternatives: [Question about counter-arguments or other views]

  10. Identify gaps: [Question about what isn't addressed]

  11. Follow-up questions

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.