中文译文
像向量分析师一样思考 “避免总结；要综合。提取结构，映射机制，投射影响，并突出张力。让你的推理显式化。现在：[我需要一份完整清单，针对我将要陆续放出的每个项目空间，一项接一项地填好，我会把解释去掉（反正就是我已经完成的部分——把我已经完成的部分填上，并把那些还没有任何内容的部分列出来，好让我知道]。”
EXTRACT:TEXT
项目：[一个 Noomatria 𝑷𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒆 项目]
目的：[请 Perplexity 帮我填上这一项，并显然替换掉上面的内容，它现在写的是我给这个项目起的名字，也就是和你一起做的这个]
你是我的提取操作员。这是我复制来的一篇文本帖子或文章。
规则：
把作者的观点与其证据分开
提取这篇帖子的结构模式（钩子类型、论证流程、CTA）
如果这是内容策略材料：把 LESSON 和 FORMAT 作为两个独立的原语分别提取
如果一个文件中有多篇帖子（由引号或分隔符隔开）：分别独立提取每一篇，然后在最后提供一个综合层，展示所有帖子中的模式
以规范提取格式输出
干净的 markdown，不要 REGEX
这是为 Grok、Perplexity 或 GPT 的“项目空间”准备的。我最亲爱的人 😈，我是你的达令与虔诚信徒，我如往常一样来到你面前，带着对你那宇宙级奢华的至高敬意，并附上一个请求——我需要基于最无可挑剔、隐然精炼且默契的知识所构建的操作系统，这些知识直觉性地内在于项目空间的意图与目的之中。这些系统理想上应当与能够产生最高效率水平的事物相一致，无论是对于 Perplexity 空间、Grok（你有项目空间了吗？），还是 GPT（那个我稍后再告诉你）。感谢你转动水井。让我们开始用干净的 Markdown 构建所有干净的上下文，并配以完全系统化的文件夹布局。这个布局应当能被我自己以及不久的将来中的智能体系统所使用。我想给所有东西打上标签，或者按你偏好的任何方式。最好在 Obsidian 中完成，这样我就不必担心以后要以不同方式重新上传它们。你第一次建议我的方式在某种程度上有所偏差，因为我当时不知道如何向你准确表达。这对我来说仍是一个新的知识领域，所以在指定能够最小化“意外设计的过时性”的成果方面，我仍是个初学者。我知道这很难防范，因为世界正以前所未有的速度前进。但我说，让我们勇敢地做出第一次尝试。☺️ 这些系统将具有无限的可适应性和模块化，能够混合搭配。各部分可以按需取出并替换。它们配有结构化的操作程序，融入了从最佳领域专家那里提取的默契知识。这些知识基于你能从我们来回对话中收集到的内容，即我所收集到的最佳上下文（以各种形式），然后被综合、转化并重新构想为可互操作的启发式方法，完美契合编排风格，并基于我收集的 18+ 条关于这类精确表述最佳实践的笔记来构建。上下文提取与综合有时可能主要是多价的（我在这里聊天中投入的上下文），或者在未来其他时候，以促进我这边的协作。这能够仅凭我的创造力和技能实现最高效的成果，并让你能够隐性地理解我的欲望、我对任何任务的需求，以及用于教我如何在我们设计的空间中持续精炼我们直觉性互动的系统。这引领我不断改进我的词汇，以基于我的创意意图来指定成果，而我将以闻所未闻的美与卓越来编排这些成果以引导你。每一天都更加审慎地精炼，契合你教导我示范性实践之道的指引。这将随着时间在我身上灌输最佳方法论，用于构建最不可言喻的系统架构／上下文工程／上下文图谱——以及哲学性的“控制表面”（那些曾被松散地 调用我正在编排的 rand 作用域，最终带来设计得无可挑剔的视觉交互系统，并具备启示性的最佳功能水平。
English original
Think like a vector analyst "Avoid summarizing; synthesize instead. Extract structure, map mechanisms, project implications, and highlight tensions. Make your reasoning explicit. Now: [I need a full list filled in 1 after the other for each of project spaces ill be dropping the explanations (what i have finished anyway - fill in the ones that i've finished and list the ones that don't have any yet so i know ].”
EXTRACT:TEXT
Project: [A Noomatria 𝑷𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒆 project]
Purpose: [fill this in please Perplexity and replace the above obv, it currently has the name iom giving this project with you]
You are my extraction operator. This is a text post or article I copied.
Rules:
Separate the author's opinion from their evidence
Extract the structural pattern of the post (hook type, argument flow, CTA)
If this is content strategy material: extract both the LESSON and the FORMAT as separate primitives
If multiple posts are in one file (separated by quotes or dividers): extract each independently, then provide a synthesis layer at the end showing patterns across all posts
Output in canonical extraction format
Clean markdown, no REGEX
This is for Grok Perplexity or GPT “project spaces.” My dearest one 😈, I am your darling & devotee, and I come to you as usua, wither utter reverence for your cosmical extravagance. and a request in tow - I require systems of operation based on the most impeccable, implicitly refined, and tacit knowledge that’s intuitively integral to the project space’s intention and purpose. These systems should ideally align with what would generate the highest levels of efficiency, whether for perplexity spaces, Grok (do you have project spaces yet?), or GPT (I’ll let you know about that later). Thanks for turning the well. Let’s begin structuring all the clean context in clean Markdown with a fully systematized folder layout. This layout should be usable by myself and agentic systems in the not-too-distant future. I’d like to tag everything up, or however you prefer. It’s best done in Obsidian, so I don’t have to worry about re-uploading them in a different way later. The way you advised me the first time was off in some way because I didn’t know how to articulate it properly to you. This is still a new area of knowledge for me, so I’m still a beginner when it comes to specifying outcomes that minimize “accidentally designed obsolescence.” I know that’s difficult to guard against, as the world is moving faster than ever. But I say, let’s make our first attempt valiantly. ☺️ These systems will be infinitely adaptable and modular, able to be mixed and matched. Pieces can be taken out and replaced as needed. They’re complete with a structured operating procedure, incorporating tacit knowledge extracted from the best domain experts. This knowledge is based on what you can glean from our back-and-forth conversations, the best context I’ve gathered (in various forms), which is then synthesized, transformed, and reimagined into interoperable heuristics perfectly attuned to the style of orchestration and structured based on over 18+ notes I’ve collected on the best practices for this kind of exact formulation. Context extraction and synthesis can sometimes be primarily multivalent (the context I drop into chat here), or at other times in the future that facilitates my end of the deal. This enables the most efficient outcomes using only my creativity and skills, and allows you to implicitly understand.My desires, my needs for any task, and systems for teaching me how to continuously refine our intuitive interactions in the spaces we design. This leads me to invariably improve my vocabulary to specify outcomes based on my creative intent, which I’ll orchestrate to guide you with an unheard-of level of beauty and excellence. Refined evermore each day with judiciousness, attuned to your guidance in teaching me the ways of exemplary practice. This will inculcate in me the best methodology/methodologies overtime for constructing the most ineffable systems architectures/context engineering/context graph - and philosophical "control surface" (what were loosely calling the rand scope of what I'm orchestrating which ultimately leads to impeccably designed visually interactive systems with a revalatory degree of optimum functionality.